Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Children With Hematological Malignancies: A Pharmacokinetic Study.

PURPOSE: Children with hematological malignancies and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at a higher risk for rapid progression of liver disease and malignancy relapse due to multiple hepatitis flares and chemotherapy interruption. They are therefore potential candidates for microelimination of HCV infection. This study aimed to assess the effect of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of direct-acting antivirals, namely ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and the SOF major metabolite GS-331007. METHODS: This was a 24-week, prospective, controlled, open-label, 2-arm PK study of patients receiving 45/200 mg once-daily LDV/SOF orally for 12 weeks. Eligible patients were HCV-RNA-positive, treatment-naive children aged 6 to <12 years and/or weighing 17 to <35 kg with genotype 4 chronic HCV infection without cirrhosis. The primary efficacy and safety end points were the achievement of sustained virologic response for all patients with absence of any adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Steady-state noncompartmental analysis was performed to determine the PK parameters of SOF, GS-331007, and LDV as the primary PK outcome. Dose suitability was based on the 90% CI of exposure geometric mean ratio percentage within 50% to 200% compared with adults. FINDINGS: Ten HCV-infected children with ALL (chemotherapy treatment group) and 12 eligible children with no malignancy (control group) were enrolled and completed the study period. All 22 patients achieved the sustained virologic response with no adverse events leading to interruption or permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Compared with the control group, the ALL group patients had similar SOF, GS-331007, and LDV exposure. Compared with adults, the AUCτ of GS-331007 was lower and the AUCτ and Cmax,ss of SOF and the Cmax,ss of LDV were modestly higher in the ALL group (acceptance limit, 50%-200%). However, the observed efficacy and favorable safety profile made these changes not clinically significant. IMPLICATIONS: Weight-based dosing of LDV/SOF (45/200 mg) is highly effective and safe among genotype 4 HCV-infected children weighing 17 to <35 kg and diagnosed with ALL undergoing maintenance chemotherapy. The similarity in the drug exposure, efficacy, and safety clinical end points between patients with and without hematological malignancy support their therapeutic equivalence. Further studies with a larger sample size may be required to confirm the safety of LDV/SOF in patients with ALL and to recommend appropriate dosing in children with hematological malignancies, if needed. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03903185.

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Ledipasvir in Egyptian patients with COVID-19 compared to standard treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which is an RNA virus similar to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the replication process. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is an approved drug to treat HCV infection. This study investigates the efficacy of Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir as a treatment for patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. This is a single-blinded parallel-randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomized equally into the intervention group that received Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (S.L. group), and the control group received Oseltamivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin (OCH group). The primary outcomes were the cure rate over time and the incidence of serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the laboratory findings. 250 patients were divided equally into each group. Both groups were similar regarding gender, but age was higher in the S.L. group (p=0.001). In the S.L. group, 89 (71.2%) patients were cured, while only 51 (40.8%) patients were cured in the OCH group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the S.L. group (RR=1.75, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meir plot showed a considerably higher cure over time in the S.L. group (Log-rank test, p=0.032). There were no deaths in the S.L. group, but there were six deaths (4.8%) in the OCH group (RR=0.08, p=0.013). Seven patients (5.6%) in the S.L. group and six patients (4.8%) in the OCH group were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (RR=1.17, P=0.776). There were no significant differences between treatment groups regarding total leukocyte and neutrophils count, lymph, and urea. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is suggestive of being effective in treating patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to compare Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with new treatment protocols.

Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Adult Patients with ß- Thalassemia Major: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with thalassemia have a lifelong need for blood transfusion, which makes them more risky to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Iron overload and chronic HCV are considered risk factors for patients with thalassemia to develop liver insults. The aim of the present study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in the treatment of chronic HCV infection in Egyptian adult patients with ß- thalassemia major. METHODS: A retrospective study included 53 patients with ß-thalassemia major with chronic HCV treated with sofosbuvir (400 mg) and ledipasvir (90 mg) as a single pill fixed-dose combination once daily for 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. RESULTS: SVR was achieved in 96.23% of patients. 47.17% of patients had minor side effects. There was a significant reduction in ALT, AST, and serum ferritin 12 weeks post-therapy. There was an insignificant change in hemoglobin level or blood transfusion requirement 12 weeks posttherapy. There was no change in iron chelators doses throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir regimen seems to be safe and highly effective in the treatment of chronic HCV in patients with ß-thalassemia major.

Clinical effectiveness of pharmacist-led versus conventionally delivered antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus in patients receiving opioid substitution therapy: a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Highly effective direct-acting antiviral drugs provide the opportunity to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but established pathways can be ineffective. We aimed to examine whether a community pharmacy care pathway increased treatment uptake, treatment completion, and cure rates for people receiving opioid substitution therapy, compared with conventional care. METHODS: This cluster-randomised trial was done in Scottish community pharmacies. Before participants were recruited, pharmacies were randomly assigned (1:1) to refer patients with evidence of HCV antibodies to conventional care or offered them care in the pharmacy (pharmacist-led care). Pharmacies were stratified by location. All pharmacies were trained to offer dried blood spot testing. All eligible participants had received opioid substitution therapy for approximately 3 months, and those eligible to receive treatment in the pharmacist-led care pathway were HCV PCR positive, were infected with HCV genotype 1 or 3, and were willing to have a pharmacist supervise their antiviral drug administration. Neither pharmacists nor patients were masked to treatment allocation. In both groups, assessment blood samples were taken, infection with HCV was confirmed, and daily oral ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90 mg ledipasivir plus 400 mg sofosbuvir) for 8 weeks for genotype 1 or daily oral sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus oral daclatasvir (60 mg) for 12 weeks for genotype 3 was prescribed by a nurse (conventional care group) or pharmacist (pharmacist-led care group). In the conventional care group, the patient received care at a treatment centre. Once prescribed, medication in both groups was delivered as daily modified directly observed therapy alongside opioid substitution therapy in the participants' pharmacy where treatment was observed on 6 days per week. The primary outcome was the number of patients with sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12) as a proportion of the number of people receiving opioid substitution therapy at participating pharmacies. Participants were monitored at each visit for nausea and fatigue; other adverse events were recorded as free text. Secondary outcomes compared key points on treatment pathway between the two groups. These key points were the proportion of patients having dry blood spot testing, the proportion of patients initiating HCV treatment, the proportion of patients completing the 8 or 12 week HCV course of treatment, and the proportion of patients with sustained virological response at 12 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02706223. FINDINGS: 56 pharmacies were randomly assigned (28 to each group; one pharmacy withdrew from the conventional care group). The 55 participating pharmacies included 2718 patients receiving opioid substitution therapy (1365 in the pharmacist-led care group and 1353 in the conventional care group). More patients met the primary endpoint of SVR12 in the pharmacist-led care group (98 [7%] of 1365) than in the conventional care group (43 [3%] of 1353; odds ratio 2·375, 95% CI 1·555-3·628, p<0·0001). More users of opioid substitution therapy in the pharmacist-led care group versus the conventional care group agreed to dry blood spot testing (245 [18%] of 1365 vs 145 [11%] of 1353, 2·292, 0·968-5·427, p=0·059); initiated treatment (112 [8%] of 1365 vs 61 [4%] of 1353, 1·889, 1·276-2·789, p=0·0015) and completed treatment (108 [8%] of 1365 vs 58 [4%] of 1353, 1·928, 1·321-2·813, p=0·0007). The data for sustained virological response at 12 months are not reported in this study: patients remain in follow-up for this outcome. No serious adverse events were recorded. INTERPRETATION: Using pharmacists to deliver an HCV care pathway made testing and treatment more accessible for patients, improved engagement, and maintained high treatment success rates. The use of this pathway could be a key part of an integrated and effective approach to HCV elimination at a community level. FUNDING: Partnership between the Scottish Government, Gilead Sciences, and Bristol-Myers Squib.

Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin and sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir in patients with genotype 1 or 3 hepatitis C virus and severe renal impairment: a multicentre, phase 2b, non-randomised, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: There is a medical need for highly effective, safe, and well tolerated treatments for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) with severe renal impairment. We investigated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir with ribavirin or ledipasvir combined with sofosbuvir in a prospective study of patients with genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault ≤30 mL/min) who were not on dialysis. METHODS: This phase 2b, open-label, non-randomised, multicentre study in the USA and New Zealand investigated three sequentially enrolled cohorts of patients. Patients were recruited from ten hospitals and clinical research centres and were included if they had genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection, a creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 mL/min, and were not on dialysis. In cohorts 1 and 2, patients received sofosbuvir (200 mg in cohort 1 and 400 mg in cohort 2) plus ribavirin 200 mg once per day for 24 weeks. In cohort 3, 18 patients received ledipasvir combined with sofosbuvir (90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir) once per day for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety and pharmacokinetic data were also collected. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01958281, and is completed. FINDINGS: This study was done between Oct 7, 2013, and Oct 29, 2017. In the sofosbuvir plus ribavirin cohorts, 32 patients were screened, of whom 20 were enrolled and assessed for efficacy and safety (ten patients in each cohort). In the ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir cohort, 33 patients were screened, of whom 18 were enrolled and assessed for treatment efficacy and safety. Four (40%, 95% CI 12-74) of ten patients in cohort 1 and six (60%, 26-88) of ten patients in cohort 2 achieved SVR12. All 18 (100%, 82-100) patients in cohort 3 achieved SVR12. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most commonly reported adverse events overall were headache (eight [21%] of 38 patients), anaemia (seven [18%] of 38 patients), and fatigue (six [16%] of 38 patients). Eight patients had serious adverse events, none of which were treatment related. There were no treatment-related cardiac events or clinically significant changes in echocardiographic parameters or creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault. INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2b study, ledipasvir combined with sofosbuvir for 12 weeks was safe and effective in patients with genotype 1 HCV infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease who were not on dialysis. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: Real-world efficacy in Thailand.

AIMS: To analyze the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in Thai patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who had pre-existing significant liver fibrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted between 1 June 2018 and 31 May 2019 at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. All patients completed 12 weeks of SOF-based regimens and had follow-up for at least 12 weeks after therapy discontinuation. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULT: A total of 185 patients were included, with 52, 63 and 70 taking SOF+Ledipasvir (SOF+LDV), SOF+LDV+ribavirin (RBV) and SOF+Pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)+RBV (SOF+Peg-IFN+RBV) respectively. Genotype (GT) 1 was predominant at 40.0%, followed by GT3 at 37.8%, and GT6 at 22.2%. Overall 95.1% of patients in this study achieved SVR (n = 176/185), and the only factor associated with SVR was HCV genotype (p = 0.001). GT6 patients had lower SVR rates compared to GT1 and GT3 patients (82.9%, 98.6%, and 98.6% respectively) while there was no association between SVR and other factors (p >0.05) such as gender, age, BMI, underlying cirrhosis, baseline HCV viral load, or prior treatment history. No serious adverse events were reported in the present study. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir-based regimens in the treatment of patients with chronic HCV infection were highly efficacious with excellent safety and tolerability profiles in a real-world setting; however, further research is required to establish whether or not such a regimen is an adequate treatment for all genotype 6 patients.

Safety and Efficacy of 8 Weeks Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 in Children Aged 4-10 Years.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of shortened 8-week regimen of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LED/SOF) combination therapy in treatment-naïve children without cirrhosis aged 4-10 years of age with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. STUDY DESIGN: This observational single arm prospective study included 30 treatment-naïve children (20 males) with proved chronic HCV fulfilling inclusion criteria. Their body weights ranged from 17 to 26 kg. Four patients were excluded from the study. All the included children received a single oral dose of LED/SOF 45/200 mg for 8 weeks. Body weight, HCV-RNA, complete blood count, and liver function tests were monitored at 0, 2, 4, and 8 weeks and sustained virologic response was evaluated after 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). The emergence of any side effects was also monitored. RESULTS: The most common risk factor (53.3%) was an parent or sibling with HCV infection. Twenty-nine patients (96.7%) were negative for HCV-RNA by week 2 of treatment and 1 patient became negative by week 4. The end of treatment response and SVR12 were 100%. Transaminases levels declined and returned to normal levels by week 2. Major side effects were fatigue in 90% (27/30) and headache in 76.7% (23/30). Side effects were minimal, tolerable, and did not interfere with daily activity or necessitate treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: A shortened 8-week regimen of LED/SOF (45/200 mg) is safe and effective with 100% SVR12 in treatment-naïve children with cirrhosis aged 4-10 years with chronic HCV infection genotype 4.

Generic Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Treatment for Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

We assessed the safety and efficacy of a generic form of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in Egyptian adolescents and compared the results with those of treatment with the brand-named form. The generic form resulted in a high response rate, significant improvement in liver function, and mild adverse effects. These results are comparable with those of the brand form at a reduced price.

Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir for 12 Weeks in Children 3 to <6 Years Old With Chronic Hepatitis C.

For children under 12 years of age who have chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, there are currently no approved treatments with direct-acting antiviral agents. We therefore evaluated the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in HCV-infected children aged 3 to <6 years. In an open-label study, patients 3 to <6 years old chronically infected with HCV genotype 1 (n = 33) or 4 (n = 1) received weight-based doses of combined ledipasvir-sofosbuvir as granules (33.75 mg/150 mg for weights <17 kg or 45 mg/200 mg for weights ≥17 kg) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). For the first 14 patients, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was done on day 10 of treatment. All patients had been infected through perinatal transmission and were treatment naïve. No patients had known cirrhosis. Ten patients (29%) weighed <17 kg. SVR12 was achieved in 97% of patients (33 of 34); the patient who did not achieve SVR12 was 3 years old and discontinued treatment after 5 days because of an adverse event "abnormal drug taste." The most common adverse events were vomiting (24% of patients), cough (21%), and pyrexia (21%). No patients experienced a serious adverse event. Intensive pharmacokinetic analysis of 13 patients for whom data were evaluable confirmed that the doses selected were appropriate. Conclusion: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was well tolerated and highly effective in children 3 to <6 years old with chronic HCV infection.

Comparing drug interaction frequencies of various hepatitis C treatment regimens among monoinfected patients.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Four regimens are recommended for treating hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Study aims were to (1) compare frequencies of contraindicated drug interactions (XDDIs) when each HCV regimen is added to medication profiles of HCV-monoinfected patients, (2) quantify the proportion of patients with XDDIs to all four regimens and (3) determine covariates independently associated with having a XDDI to all four regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed within Upstate New York Veterans Healthcare Administration. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) age ≥18 years, (2) HCV monoinfection and (3) available medication list. Data extracted were: demographics, comorbidities, and medication list. Primary outcome was XDDIs involving patient's home medications and each HCV regimen. University of Liverpool drug interaction website was used to define XDDIs. Two-way comparisons of regimens were performed using McNemar's test where p<0.0083 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine predictors. RESULTS: Of the 4047 subjects, mean±standard deviation age was 59.8±7.6. Median (interquartile range) number of medications used was 7 [4-11]. Frequencies of XDDIs after the addition of each regimen ranged from 2.8% to 17.8% and were mostly statistically different from one another. There were 95 (2.3%) patients with XDDIs to all four regimens. Predictors of having XDDIs to all four regimens were ≥6 medications and HCV infection ≥10 years. CONCLUSION: The frequencies of XDDIs varied between HCV regimens. Number of medications and duration of HCV infection were predictors of having XDDIs to all four regimens.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir hepatitis C treatment in a single centre in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Newer direct-acting antiviral therapies are increasingly becoming the therapy of choice in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Here, we report the safety and effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in real-world cohorts in Germany. METHODS: Patients initiated on SOF/VEL 12 weeks or LDV/SOF 8, 12 or 24 weeks regimens in a single German centre were included in this study. Data on treatment outcomes and adverse events (AE) were analysed in patients with available sustained virologic response 12 weeks after cessation of treatment (SVR12) information overall and by subgroups. RESULTS: This study included 115 patients who received SOF/VEL from July-2016 to July-2017, and 249 patients who received LDV/SOF from November-2014 to September-2015. Overall, SVR12 was achieved in 99% of patients on SOF/VEL ± ribavirin 12 weeks independent of HCV genotype, treatment history, or cirrhosis status, and in 96% of patients treated with LDV/SOF 8 weeks or LDV/SOF ± ribavirin 12 or 24 weeks. In genotype 1 treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic patients, ≥99% achieved SVR12 across SOF/VEL and LDV/SOF regimens. Likewise, 100% of genotype 3-cirrhotic patients on SOF/VEL ± ribavirin regimens achieved SVR12. Grade 3/4 AE were reported in 13 (5.2%) patients on LDV/SOF and in 1 (<1%) patient on SOF/VEL. CONCLUSION: Overall, SOF/VEL and LDV/SOF achieved high SVR rates in a broad patient population. We showed the effectiveness of SOF/VEL as a pan-genotypic regimen, and regardless of treatment history or cirrhosis status. Use of such therapies improves outcomes and contributes towards the global efforts to eradicate HCV.

Association of Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Treatment With Uveitis in Patients Treated for Hepatitis C.

Importance: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir has become the current standard of care for hepatitis C since its release in 2014. Therefore, potential adverse effects are important to identify. Objective: To report findings of uveitis after treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for hepatitis C. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series includes patients treated in an urban academic setting with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for hepatitis C from June 2015 to June 2017 who are known to have developed signs and symptoms of posterior uveitis. Exposures: All patients had been treated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for hepatitis C for a total of 12 weeks. All patients but 1 had finished treatment prior to presentation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Signs of posterior uveitis on ophthalmic testing. Results: Data were collected from 6 patients (median age, 64.5 [range, 54-72] years). Five patients were male; 4 were white, and 2 were African American. The mean (SD) time between beginning of treatment and presentation was 8.8 (5.5) months. Both eyes were affected in 3 of the 6 patients (total, 9 eyes). The median presenting visual acuity in affected eyes was 20/40 (range, 20/20-20/70). All patients had a negative systemic uveitis workup. Five patients presented with blurred vision, and 1 had a paracentral scotoma. The main ocular findings were peripheral vasculitis (in 8 of 9 eyes), papillitis (in 7 of 9 eyes), and cystoid macular edema (in 6 of 9 eyes). The median follow-up was 8 (range, 4-13) months. The median final visual acuity was 20/40 (range, 20/20-20/200). Conclusions and Relevance: In these patients, it appears that treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for hepatitis C was associated with a mild posterior uveitis different than interferon retinopathy. Given the large number of patients treated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, these findings cannot be considered causative, and an association cannot be quantified at this time.

Sexual Dysfunction in a Patient Taking Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Case Report.

Sexual dysfunction is a bothersome side effect of several medications, though it has not yet been reported with the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C. However, sexual dysfunction is a potentially unrecognized side effect of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir that could result in nonadherence and treatment failure. We report a case of a 42-year-old man with a sudden onset of sexual dysfunction with the initiation of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C. The patient had no prior history or risk factors for the development of sexual dysfunction. His symptoms resolved upon discontinuation of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir after a successful 12-week course. Clinicians should be aware that sexual dysfunction is a possible side effect of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and educate patients appropriately. Adherence should be emphasized as the risks of untreated hepatitis C virus far outweigh transient sexual dysfunction.

[Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir combination for chronic hepatitis C infection in children and adolescents]. / Combinación de ledipasvir/sofosbuvir como tratamiento de la infección crónica por hepatitis C.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus infection is world health problem. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir combination in chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infection in paediatric patients. METHODS: Eligible patients to be treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir were patients from 6 to 18 years old with a chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection. The duration and doses of antiviral drugs were changed depending on patient age, fibrosis stage, and PEGylated interferon+ribavirin experience status. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: A total of nine patients (7 males) with a median age of 14.8 years (8.48-17.91) were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir combination. Five patients received previous treatment with PEGylated interferon+ribavirin during a median of 8.5 months (3-12 months). Eight patients had some degree of fibrosis (1 patient presented with F1, three patients F2, 2 patients F3, and 2 patients F4). The median pre-treatment viral load was 6.2 Log [5.9-6.8] with the HCV RNA becoming negative six weeks after starting the treatment in 100% of the patients. All patients maintained a sustained viral response at 12 weeks. Three patients (33.3%) had some type of adverse effect (2 headache and one oral thrush). The median post-treatment follow-up was 24 weeks (12-104). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in paediatric patients with chronic HCV infection genotype 1 and 4 is safe and effective with SVR12 and similar to those reported in adults.

A retrospective study of the efficacy of sofosbuvir plus NS5A inhibitors for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype-2 chronic infection.

BACKGROUND: A combination of sofosbuvir (SOF)+NS5A inhibitor therapies is the main treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-2 (GT-2) chronic infection, but the data are rarely reported in China. This study aimed to investigate the virological response and liver fibrosis improvement among GT-2 patients receiving SOF+NS5A inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who received SOF+NS5A inhibitors between March 2016 and July 2017 were recruited. The treatment duration was 12 weeks and the treatment strategies included SOF+daclatasvir, SOF/ledipasvir, and SOF/velpatasvir. The primary endpoint was a sustained virologic response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) at week 12 after the end of therapy and the secondary endpoint was the improvement in liver stiffness and scores of apartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis-4. RESULTS: A total of 30 GT-2 patients were enrolled, with 13 (43.3%) patients in SOF+daclatasvir, 13 (43.3%) patients in SOF/ledipasvir, and four (13.3%) patients in SOF/velpatasvir. All patients [30/30 (100%)] achieved SVR, irrespective of treatment regimens and degree of liver fibrosis. After the treatment, liver fibrosis scores of apartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (2.27±2.14 vs. 0.89±0.77, P=0.003) and fibrosis-4 (1.17±1.22 vs. 0.42±0.25, P=0.013) were both significantly lower than those before treatment. CONCLUSION: SOF+NS5A inhibitor therapies may induce an excellent virological response and fibrosis improvement in HCV GT-2-infected patients.

Is sofosbuvir/ledipasvir safe for the hearts of children with hepatitis C virus?

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic bradycardia has been reported in adults treated for chronic hepatitis C using sofosbuvir based regimens. AIM: We studied the cardiac safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in Egyptian children, treated for chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: The study included 40 hepatitis C virus infected children and adolescents 12-17 years old, using the combination of sofosbuvir (400 mg)/ledipasvir (90 mg) in a single oral tablet (Harvoni) taken daily for 12 weeks. All subjects underwent a baseline standard 12-lead surface Electrocardiography that was repeated at 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. Electrocardiography parameters (Heart Rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS, QT interval, corrected QT interval, QT dispersion, JT interval, corrected JT interval, JT dispersion, Tpeak-Tend interval) were compared at the 3 different time points during antiviral therapy. RESULTS: No symptoms related to the cardiovascular system were reported during treatment. There were no cases of symptomatic bradycardia/syncope. Heart rate was noted to be significantly lower and RR and QT intervals were significantly longer in the baseline electrocardiography. Heart rate was significantly lower and RR interval was significantly longer in patients with higher viral load. CONCLUSION: No adverse cardiovascular events were observed in this group of HCV infected children and adolescents treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. None of the patients developed bradyarrhythmias during treatment.

The Effectiveness of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Youth With Genotype 4 Hepatitis C Virus: A Single Egyptian Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Licensure of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in adolescents was based on clinical trials on patients mainly with genotype 1. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and short-term safety of this newly approved antiviral in adolescents with HCV genotype 4. METHODS: This was a study of 51 HCV-infected adolescents, who received the adult dose of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, once daily for 12 weeks, and were followed-up for 12 weeks post-treatment. Laboratory tests, quantitation of HCV RNA, HCV genotyping, IL-28rs gene polymorphism and transient elastography were performed at baseline. Follow-up visits were done for blood testing and adverse events recording. RESULTS: The mean age was 14.7 ± 1.5 years (11-17.5), with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1. All patients were genotype 4a, and 76.5% had the CC IL-28 gene polymorphism. About 50% gave a history of HCV-infected mother, and 31% were treatment-experienced. Liver stiffness was F0 in 72.5%, F0-F1 in 13.7% and F1-F2 in 13.7%. Adverse events were mainly abdominal pain in 72.5%, headache in 64.7% and diarrhea in 53% of patients; these were mild. A reversible increase in creatinine level with a concomitant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in the first month of treatment. By the end of week 12, a significant decline in liver enzymes was observed. All patients achieved an early, end of treatment, and a sustained virologic response. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent patients with genotype 4 chronic HCV infection achieved a good response rate with good ontreatment tolerability for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

Impact of new direct-acting antiviral drugs on hepatitis C virus-related decompensated liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of treatment of hepatitis C virus with direct-acting antiviral drugs in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) are still unclear. AIM: To evaluate the degree of improvement in hepatic decompensation events and quality of life (QOL) in treated patients with DLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with hepatitis C virus-related DLC were included; 75 of these patients received treatment (group I) [sofosbuvir (SOF) with either daclatasvir or ledipasvir for 24 weeks without ribavirin (RBV) or for 12 weeks with RBV] and 75 patients did not receive treatment as a comparable group (group II). Patients who achieved a sustained virological response at 12 weeks were assessed in terms of decompensation events, model for end-stage liver disease score, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, biochemical changes, and QOL (applied on Mcguill QOL questionnaire) before starting treatment and 6 months after end of treatment, and were compared with untreated patients. RESULTS: Forty-two (56%) patients received SOF/daclatasvir for 24 weeks without RBV and 19 (25.3%) patients received SOF/ledipasvir for 24 weeks without RBV. The model for end-stage liver disease score improved in treated patients (mean change -1.73), but worsened in untreated patients (mean change +11.8) before and after 6 months. Also, the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score improved significantly (P<0.001). Serum albumin, prothrombin time, bilirubin, α-fetoprotein, and alanine aminotransferase improved in treated patients (P<0.001). Health-related QOL improved in treated patients (mean change +17.65) and worsened in untreated ones (mean change -18.68; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Treated patients with DLC showed an improvement in liver tests and health-related QOL. Longer durations of follow-up for decompensation events are needed.

Tolerability and effectiveness of generic direct-acting antiviral drugs in eradication of hepatitis C genotype 4 among Egyptian patients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated tolerability and effectiveness of generic, less expensive direct antiviral drugs in the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV GT-4) in an Egyptian cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we analysed data from 648 patients with HCV GT4 attending Alexandria Main University Hospital from January 2016 to May 2017 [488 treatment naïve/160 treatment-experienced/288 with chronic hepatitis/360 with cirrhosis]. Patients received generic sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (n = 168, treatment naïve = 136, treatment-experienced = 32) or sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (n = 480, treatment naïve = 352, treatment-experienced = 128) ± ribavirin. We assessed sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment, non-response, relapse, treatment discontinuation and drug adverse reactions. RESULTS: An overall sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment was achieved in 97.8%, non-response in 0.6%, relapse in 0.3% and discontinuation of treatment in 1.3% of patients. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin regimen attained an overall sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in 96.4% of patients (100% of treatment-experienced vs 95.6% of treatment naïve, P = 0.28), vs 98.3% for sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin regimen (100% of treatment-experienced vs 97.7% of treatment naïve, P = 0.08). No severe drug adverse events or deaths were reported except anaemia due to ribavirin. CONCLUSION: Generic direct antiviral drugs used in treating Egyptian patients with HCV GT-4 demonstrated equal potency, safety and tolerability compared to original brands, with low cost which would help to provide treatment to a larger scale of patients.